Jump to content

Talk:State of Palestine

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request October 26, 2024

[edit]

There are 2 bare URLs in the "References" section. I have created full citations for those URLs:

Please convert those bare URLs into citations. Thank you.

(Note: The bare URLs are already marked as such. Just do Ctrl+F search of "bare URL" to find them) ApexParagon (talk) 03:08, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Thanks for picking those up. ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · contribs · email) 03:45, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 29 November 2024

[edit]

In the part about years 1947-1948 and the partition plan, this article fails to mention that the partition plan was agreed by the Israeli side, and declined by the arab side. It also states that a civil war had started, without mentioning that 6 Arab countries joined the attack on 1948 (started as a civil war, and became a war between countries). 38.87.93.153 (talk) 07:34, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{Edit extended-protected}} template. Remsense ‥  07:35, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Currently it says in part In 1947, the UN adopted a partition plan for a two-state solution in the remaining territory of the mandate. The plan was accepted by the Jewish leadership but rejected by the Arab leaders, and Britain refused to implement the plan. Am I missing something? I believe this is accurate and verifiable, but it's not currently supported by any inline sources, and should be. Andrewa (talk) 06:57, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect State of Palestine' has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 December 7 § State of Palestine' until a consensus is reached. Ca talk to me! 15:01, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Palestinian Olympians proudly represent their nation on the international stage"

[edit]

Non-informative statement, with a supportive tone, that fails to meet NPOV criteria. Pacifico (talk) 17:01, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

agreed, they are hardly going to do it in shame. Slatersteven (talk) 17:14, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 10 December 2024

[edit]

Under the ethnic groups category, "Palestinian Arabs" is listed as the only ethnic group. However, there are many ethnic groups, including Armenians and Syriac Palestinians. I think that having this category is not useful. However, if it is going to be on the page, it should include more of the ethnicities in Palestine. SirCapybara (talk) 16:45, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Ultraodan (talk) 13:57, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To improve clarity, revise sentence re. Partition Plan

[edit]

Current: ". . . [the UN] proposed a _partition plan_, for two independent Arab and Jewish states and an independent entity for Jerusalem, but. . . ."

Suggested revision: ". . . in 1947 [the UN] proposed that Palestine be partitioned (divided) into two independent states, one Arab and the other Jewish. The _partition plan_ specified that Jerusalem become an independent international city. But. . . ."

Note: _partition plan_ is an existing link, which I propose remain untouched. Avi (talk) 11:44, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Diacritics

[edit]

@Freedoxm—as I insuated, the problem with the tashkil here is that they are totally unnecessary. Really, that is all I need, since I would imagine the responsibility is really on you to have an actual reason to add them. They introduce an awful lot of visual noise, and do not aid in their purpose for being (e.g. a plain reference for what we assume is an audience that speaks English but not necessarily another language. In fact, their use might be harder, as these are not the usual forms; instead, they have been loaded with symbols that are used while teaching children and students how to read. If that is part of your motivation here I want to strongly push back against it, as Wikipedia is not a how-to guide We do not place Arabic text such that it is maximally helpful to those who are learning the language.

Please self-revert, as your changes are completely arbitrary and nonstandard, and like I said can easily concretely hurt more than they help. Remsense ‥  06:57, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed the ping. Hope you don't mind. Sean.hoyland (talk) 07:02, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Guh, thank you. How did I even do that badly?) Remsense ‥  07:05, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
How is it unnecessary? Besides, what's wrong with diacritics???🗽Freedoxm🗽(talkcontribs) 21:58, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Don't just ask the same question you did in the edit summary please. I gave you reasons directly above. If you cannot actually give a good reason for the addition, please self-revert. Remsense ‥  22:01, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
that violates the entire purpose, but since you want my attention, i'll do it. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talkcontribs) 22:02, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]