User talk:Albert3306

Hello, Albert3306, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Ahunt (talk) 17:21, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started

Finding your way around

Editing articles

Getting help

Frequently asked questions
Cheatsheet
Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
Help pages
Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

Community Portal
Join a WikiProject
Follow Wikipedia etiquette
Practice civility
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

August 2023

Hello, I'm Belbury. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Microsoft Analysis Services, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The anonymous corporate blog entry you cited here doesn't look very reliable, and also doesn't appear directly related to the statement being made in the sentence. Belbury (talk) 17:26, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please elaborate on the types of sources that Wikipedia considers appropriate? Albert3306 (talk) 17:32, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I do this: whatever Wikipedia tells me that here citation is required, I search for the same information on Google, and the information that I find, I use it as a source. But first, I verify it myself to make sure if this method is correct. Albert3306 (talk) 17:35, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SOURCETYPES should give you some idea. Belbury (talk) 17:41, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

please give me ideas how to take care of that Albert3306 (talk) 17:47, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You can visit the Wikipedia:Teahouse if you want help getting started with Wikipedia. Belbury (talk) 17:59, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Siri. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Belbury (talk) 17:33, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Aizaz.bahria (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 17:33, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Belbury I don't own neither I have that much time to take part in such things. Aizaz.bahria (talk) 21:13, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Aizaz.bahria: The two of you were adding spam links to myelectricsparks.com for a few days in mid August, then stopped. Belbury (talk) 08:33, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Belbury Do you think everything is spammy to you? I have always contributed. Why did my previous ID get forgotten? I have been working for Wikipedia for the past 3 years. I don't know why you think I'm wrong; I have always contributed. Aizaz.bahria (talk) 11:52, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All I'm saying is that the specific domain myelectricsparks.com looks like a low-quality spam site to me, and that you two guys were adding links to it to some of the same articles on the same few days in August. Thank you for stopping. Belbury (talk) 11:56, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Belbury I will prioritize what is authentic and beneficial for Wikipedia. I have been working for the past three years, it's not my first time. that you are teaching me which is spammy and which is good, I have reviewed the content of the first domain and diligently worked day and night for Wikipedia. You wake up and there is spam. Please read the initial content and draw a conclusion for the rest. Aizaz.bahria (talk) 12:06, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]