This username matched "4chan|8chan|reddit" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 05:10, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Note on file these are typically names created as part of campaigns either from within or against one of these sites -- DQB (owner / report) 05:10, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 07:10, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
This username matched "Attempting to skip filters using multiple similar characters" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 07:10, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Note on file Multiple special characters can be contained in the same phrase, this rule detects when one or more occurs. -- DQB (owner / report) 07:10, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Comment: So far their edits have been disruptive, so they might get blocked for vandalism. However, they haven't made any promotional edits, so as of now, it's not a username violation and may just be a coincidence with the rapper on Soundcloud. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 15:56, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
Keep monitoring the user, until their username is more clear. They've tried to make promotional edits but have done a poor job of it so far. Perhaps they'll quit on their own. Otherwise, a block is in their future. — rsjaffe🗣️ 00:16, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Not a violation of the username policy. Real names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. It looks like the user confused creating an article with creating an account. If they are the named person, the username is fine(though a bit odd with the parenthetical part). If they're not, that's different, but we should try discussion first. 331dot (talk) 13:28, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
